Search for: "Lee v. Small Claims Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2014, 4:26 am
— via Evil Skippy at Work US Whistleblower Laws: What Employers Need to Know — via i-Sight Investigation Software BlogWage & Hour NBC Inks $6.4 Million Deal to Stem Intern Uprising — via Law.com The Supreme Court’s Recent Decision on the Taxation of Severance Payments — via Suits by Suits Wage and Hour Cases to Watch at the Supreme Court: Part 1--Integrity Staffing — via Wage & Hour Insights Lee v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Exxon survey: Nike v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 2:03 pm
’s explanation for the coding of Wisconsin v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
That said, if someone tried to kill me by throwing a few small cotton balls at me, I wouldn't be afraid but I'd still be shocked at the intent.As Boston-based tech and IP lawyer Lee Gesmer mentioned (in the only opinion on Google's Supreme Court petition I've read or heard so far), "the Supreme Court accepts review of approximately 1% of cases appealed to it. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:13 am
The same principle has been applied to applications to amend under section 75 of the 1977 Act: see Sara Lee Household & Body Care UK v Johnson Wax Ltd [2001] FSR 17 and DataCard Corp v Eagle Technologies Ltd [2011] EWHC 244 (Pat) at [226].105. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:54 pm
Superior Court (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 864, 876, 269 Cal.Rptr. 647; Grant v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am
An enemy is willing to devote a vast amount of time and brain power to ferreting out errors both large and small, and this without any compensation. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:12 am
The Court examined whether the activity in question (drinking by guests on a small fishing boat) “posed [no] more than a fanciful risk to commercial shipping. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:27 am
The court rejected the claims against all of the defendants. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am
On Friday, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released its decision in Oracle America Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
RUTAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
The 2006 RFRA Decision Holding That a Small Religious Group Has Rights to Use an Untested and Illegal Drug In 2006, in its first and only RFRA decision on the merits to date, the Supreme Court held in Gonzales v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am
He said, “It is no accident that the claims that you have before you in these cases are brought by small closely held corporations that have firmly held religious beliefs. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 11:48 am
O’Connor: the issue in red flags is that the way courts have addressed it with willful blindness, but that’s not in the statute. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:20 pm
And in such situations, the Court has already unanimously rejected claims for religious exemptions, in cases such as Lee and Tony & Susan Alamo Foundation. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:34 pm
Lee (1982), and Gillette v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:37 am
Yong Ki Hong v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
To the contrary, the Court has rejected exactly such arguments in cases such as Lee (see 455 U.S. at 260-61) and Gillette. [read post]
