Search for: "Lite v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2012, 4:27 am
” There's a chance this may change with the Supreme Court's consideration of an Arizona case, Martinez v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:30 am
(Wry v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:34 am
Cohen v. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 11:13 am
She moved for pendente lite support, asking for monthly maintenance of $11,500 and child support of $7,290, and a direction that the husband directly pay the carrying costs on the marital residence, child care expenses, and all health care expenses for the family. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm
AT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 42 – Read Judgment The Court of Appeal has upheld a challenge to a control order on the basis that the person subject to the order (‘the controllee’) had not been given sufficient information about the case against him. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:03 am
Dist. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 8:28 pm
Details: Mega Brands America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Wilkinson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 6:56 am
The December 14, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion in Roof v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 4:00 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 9:06 pm
Aukerman Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 5:21 am
Defendant stated that the discovery he sought was relevant to the issue whether plaintiff's actions caused appreciation to the separate property which should then be included in the marital estate. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 9:46 am
Steinorth, Demokratie lite? [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:02 pm
The Republicans could demand, say, a constitutional amendment overruling Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Rossum v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:02 pm
Accordingly, in Secrest, the Virginia divorce court postponed the trial for a month, at which time it would award pendente lite relief on spousal support and child support. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
State of Uttar Pradesh and Others, (2009) 12 SCC 26. [read post]
