Search for: "Little v. U.s.*"
Results 201 - 220
of 2,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
The decision in Latif v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:38 pm
See this post.Despite history and widespread usage of "manner of execution" and "method of execution" as synonymous, Judge Chutkan decided that "manner" includes all the details of the state's procedure, down to such things as catheter insertion.If upheld, that would be a neat little Catch-22 preventing enforcement of the federal death penalty in many states. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 1:03 pm
US v. [read post]
27 May 2007, 6:12 pm
See, Parker v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:58 am
This 2020, opinion is also from the Southern District, Houston Division, and is styled, Michael Dyll and Remi Dyll v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am
In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:57 am
The Ninth Circuit handed down an interesting little habeas ruling today in Kessee v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:46 am
Little Hunting Park (1968) and Jackson v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 9:43 am
The methods suggested by the specifications, for the Supreme Court, amounted to "little more than two research assignments" involving "painstaking experimentation". [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2021, 12:12 pm
" Keith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Patents began as little more than feudal favors. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
According to Harold Green’s daughter, the purpose of the UBS account was, as follows: As you know, ever since you have been a little girl, I have taught you that we need to have a safe haven because I am Jewish. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
Bormes v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:44 pm
Merriam Co. v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:27 pm
Porto v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:34 am
In Gubala v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 2:09 pm
US v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 11:54 pm
Under Title VII, when there is, as here, no direct evidence of employment discrimination, the claims are to be analyzed under the burden shifting test of McDonnell Douglass v. [read post]
