Search for: "Long v. People's Department Store"
Results 201 - 220
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
EFF has long advocated for corporate liability for aiding governmental surveillance, including in the Doe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 10:10 am
And on the constitutional front, the focus in US v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:06 am
Christopher v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 11:40 am
But who has access to all that surveillance data, and how long it is stored? [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Driver and passenger entered convenience store and were approached by LEOs. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 1:47 pm
Dec. 14, 2010) found a reasonable expectation of privacy in email records, requiring a warrant under the Fourth Amendment to compel disclosure of communication stored at or transmitted through an ISP, regardless of how long it had been stored. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:26 am
Kazakhstan On November 26, 2013, Kazakhstani Law No. 94-V on Personal Data and its Protection came into force, defining such concepts as “personal data” among others, but left some ambiguity in how data might be transferred and/or stored internationally. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 8:16 pm
A magazine publishes the statement that most of the sales staff of a department store are homosexuals. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:05 am
Seife v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:03 pm
Based on an exception articulated in Montana v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:49 am
In Altman v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:20 am
Don’t depart without really good reason. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 6:33 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 4:26 pm
Artists have legitimate reasons to use existing images beyond just to parody them or comment directly upon them and Cariou v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 6:07 am
(I need to preface this post with a caveat: It is very long because it addresses difficult issues involved in deciding when a Public Records Act applies to a state employee's use of his/her cell phone to conduct official business. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:35 am
” During the investigation, Brewster also interviewed a long-time female employee who denied any hostility or sexual tension in the department. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 5:30 am
Enjaian v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
See Bennett v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:14 pm
It’s been a long two years since the Dobbs decision to overturn Roe v. [read post]
