Search for: "MARK D. LINK" Results 201 - 220 of 4,272
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2018, 9:54 am by Danny O'Brien
That vote marked the last chance for the democratically-elected members of the European Parliament (MEPs) to submit fixes to the directive — under the usual procedures. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:55 pm
Mark Bennett has a link to the allegations here. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
The TTAB turned a double play in affirming Section 2(d) and 2(e)(1) refusals of the mark NAP OF THE CARIBBEAN for "telecommunications services, namely, providing central connection points for telecommunication network carriers. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm by Eric Goldman
This internal use of the mark “Zorcor” as a key word to trigger the display of sponsored links is not use of the mark in a trademark sense. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 2:40 am by John L. Welch
Links to event and news further distract the reader from the mark.Just because the webpage contains a description of the software does not mean that the specimen must be accepted. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
Briefs and other papers for each case may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm by Bill Marler
The products subject to recall bear the establishment number “P-10695″ inside the USDA mark of inspection. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:32 pm
The facts of the case were "straightforward and not in dispute": the mark SITE PRO-1 did not appear in the sponsored search results linking to Better Metal's website. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
In my view, even before INSIGNIA, the Board usually looked at the degree of strength of the mark and considered whether the mark was famous for Section 2(d) purposes, but not just apply a yes-no test. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 10:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Also impacting the legislative dynamic will be opposition lobbying, PTAB rules changes, CAFC rulings, and the approaching change in administration. link: http://patentspostgrant.com/senate-moves-to-cripple-gains-of-america-invents-actRoberts' "evidence from scholars" is a link to Professor Chien:http://www.politico.com/agenda/story/2015/06/the-scariest-number-in-the-patent-debate-is-also-wrong-000068 [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:33 am by John L. Welch
In another enervating clash of insurance company marks, the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of COLONY for "life insurance underwriting" on the ground of likely confusion with the registered mark COLONY MEMBER ARGO GROUP & Design for "insurance services, namely, writing commercial excess and surplus insurance" [GROUP disclaimed]. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 8:51 am
" And so it affirmed the Section 2(d) refusal.Applicant described its specimen of use [here] as "the support webpage showing a white box in the center of the page displaying the words ‘Here for the Girls.'" The mark HERE FOR THE GIRLS appears in the URL of the web page and in a white box in the middle of the page. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 3:24 am
Woly, Inc., Opposition No. 91241442 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark shown below left, for "wrist watches," in view of the registered and allegedly famous mark shown below right for, inter alia, watches.] [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:49 am by John L. Welch
McSweet LLC, Opposition No. 91178758 [Section 2(d) and 43(c) opposition to registration of MCSWEET for pickled vegetable products, in view of  Opposer's alleged "Mc-formative" family of marks]. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 5:10 am by John L. Welch
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.January 10, 2013 - 2 PM: In re Pan American Grain MFG. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 3:43 am
[Yes] TTABlog Test: Are These Two Stylized "X" Marks Confusable for Footwear? [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:59 am
Marke Enterprises, LLC, Oppositions Nos. 91214779 and 91215509 [Section 2(d) oppositions to registration of VAGISERT, in standard character and stylized form, for "Vaginal antifungal preparations," in view of the registered marks VAGISIL and VAGISTAT for various feminine products.]February 23, 2021 - 11 AM: Monster Energy Company v. [read post]