Search for: "MARTINEZ v. US "
Results 201 - 220
of 1,187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 9:45 am
This shop sold cacti and associated plants under the name Prick (& the Britney Spears inspired company name Prick Me Baby One More Time).While cacti and tattoos are not often confused, the geographical proximity and similar names concerned Mr Martinez and led to a series of social media posts followed by the inevitable legal letter and claim: Martinez (t/a Prick) & Anor v Prick Me Baby One More Time Ltd (t/a Prick) & Anor [2018] EWHC 776 (IPEC).Some prickly… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 8:43 pm
Raimondo and Relentless, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:23 pm
Martinez, No. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm
The rationale of Martinez-Lopez applies with equal force to section 11378, the statute before us. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:36 pm
Martinez-Medina v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 10:48 am
The prosecutor conceded during closing argument that the murders did not involve torture, so the use of this aggravating factor (and related jury instructions) was not harmless.The panel remanded eight guilt-phase claims for further proceedings in light of Martinez v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:24 am
Department of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341 or Martinez v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:31 am
The State asserts that Dimas–Martinez v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:00 am
(See, e.g., Duran v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
It is difficult to conceive of any instance of juror misconduct that could not support reversal based on the rationale enunciated in Dimas-Martinez v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:06 am
” KSR Int’l v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 10:24 am
Finally, he has failed to persuade us that his consecutive sentences are inappropriate. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
Davis, No. 16-6219, involves the continuing fallout from Martinez v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:24 am
However, Smith remains the law, and CLS v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:21 pm
Martinez-Medina v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 9:08 pm
Webb v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 9:08 pm
LEXIS 53088 (ED CA, April 19, 2016), a California federal magistrate judge recommended dismissing a Buddhist inmate's complaint about denial of chapel access for group services.In Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 8:00 am
See Martinez v. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 9:25 pm
In that regard (the law, not the beignets), the Court of Appeal, in Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:15 am
The state’s new petition added a question on whether the Court would extend a 2012 decision, Martinez v. [read post]
