Search for: "Marker v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 270
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
On the other side are cases such as United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
What are the lessons learned so far from the O104:H4 outbreak? [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:35 pm
The new false marking statute will limit lawsuits to being filed only by the government or those that can show a competitive injury from the false marking: (1) IN GENERAL- Section 292 of title 35, United States Code, is amended– (A) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the following: ‘Only the United States may sue for the penalty authorized by this subsection. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:08 pm
In 1936, when a Court majority stretched its judicial muscles in Ashwander v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
Robert V. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 2:06 am
” This view is endorsed in NaturaLawn of America, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
Today our products are sold in over 50 countries – across Europe, Africa, the United States, South America and the Asia Pacific. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Text grew by 1000 words, but the real problem was that the delegates didn’t seem to see that markers of compromise had been laid down. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
United States, 533 F. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,392,227 entitled LIQUID FOR PRODUCING MARKER VAPOR, A METHOD OF PRODUCING MARKER VAPOR AND A METHOD OF INSPECTION WITH MARKER VAPOR and owned by Star Envirotech. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 6,392,227 entitled LIQUID FOR PRODUCING MARKER VAPOR, A METHOD OF PRODUCING MARKER VAPOR AND A METHOD OF INSPECTION WITH MARKER VAPOR and owned by Star Envirotech. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 1:24 pm
She argued that Article 8 imposed on the State a positive obligation to facilitate the gypsy way of life (Chapman v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 27238/95, BAILII: [2001] ECHR 43, ECHR 2001 I and Connors v. the United Kingdom, no. 66746/01, BAILII: [2004] ECHR 223, 27 May 2004) and in granting such a wide-ranging injunction the authorities were acting in violation of this obligation. 21. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
-Subject to the limitations under paragraph (2), if the issue of an original patent is delayed due to the failure of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to issue a patent within 3 years after the actual filing date of the application in the United States… the term of the patent shall be extended 1 day for each day after the end of that 3-year period until the patent is issued. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
-Subject to the limitations under paragraph (2), if the issue of an original patent is delayed due to the failure of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to issue a patent within 3 years after the actual filing date of the application in the United States… the term of the patent shall be extended 1 day for each day after the end of that 3-year period until the patent is issued. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:41 pm
Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
