Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law" Results 201 - 220 of 1,618
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2008, 10:41 am
Doc Berman over at Sentencing Law & Policy recently asked what "sleeper" cases at the US Supreme Court people were watching, and I mentioned that, though not a sentencing issue per se, I was interested in the outcome of of Melendez-Diaz v Massachussetts, which was granted cert this spring and will be argued this fall. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:29 am by admin
Escondido, the Supreme Court considered only the first question: Was Escondido’s mobile home park law a physical taking of property? [read post]
14 May 2009, 6:47 am
Question — Can Belmonte patent his bowling style? [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:39 am by Melissa Mitchell
On remand, a jury once again upheld Amgen’s claims as valid, but the court set aside the jury’s decision and granted Sanofi’s motion for a judgment as a matter of law (JMOL). [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Orin Kerr
But I don’t see how it could matter for purposes of the Fourth Amendment question of what is a “search. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At TribLive, Brian Bowling looks at Monday’s cert grant in Knick v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 1:17 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent eligibility is a question of law. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 10:01 pm by Dennis Crouch
By Sarah Burstein, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:12 pm
This case now raises fundamental questions of what can be patented? [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Gene Quinn
  The decision to grant cert. comes only days after the United States Patent and Trademark Office refused to grant reexamination of the patent in question. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 2:49 pm by Kalvis Golde
Garland 22-436Issues: (1) Whether courts of appeals review de novo – as a question of law – or for substantial evidence – as a question of fact – a Board of Immigration Appeals’ determination that established facts do not rise to the level of persecution; and (2) whether being prohibited by government officials from freely and openly practicing one’s religion constitutes persecution as a matter of law. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 1:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
And like a state, it is an autonomous political entity sovereign over matters not covered by the United States Constitution. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 11:34 am by Kenneth Vercammen
Since, as the parties agree, there is no genuine issue of material fact, the matter was ripe for summary judgment as involving only a question of law, Brill v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:49 am by Florian Mueller
Also, a big question here is whether obviousness is a legal question for a judge to decide or a factual question for a jury to render a verdict on. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 11:41 pm
Justice Breyer (who was honored at Fenway Park in 2006) shares ownership duties with Alito and likewise removed himself from the case.Their recusal under the ethics law, 28 U.S.C. 455(b)(4) comes because a justice "shall" disqualify himself if he has "a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy ... [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 10:00 pm
 With the Circuit Courts split on this "wholly groundless" exception, the Supreme Court granted cert. to decide the question of whether the exception is consistent with the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]