Search for: "Matter of Charles B."
Results 201 - 220
of 1,108
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
The most senior White House officials—Mulvaney, Eisenberg and Blair, along with other individuals like Bolton and his deputy, Charles Kupperman—have either spurned a subpoena or declined to appear voluntarily because the White House has claimed they are absolutely immune from compelled congressional testimony. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
Cinemas cOULD now screen Cecil B. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
See Charles L. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
It became the norm for a variety of reasons having nothing to do with the history or, for that matter, the text. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:51 am
Authors’ note: This article is developed out of prior writing on Lawfare, including our own work and a series of deposition summaries written by Lawfare editors and contributors Charlotte Butash, Kelsey Clinton, Mikhaila Fogel, Vishnu Kannan, Patrick McDonnell, Jacob Schulz, Chinmayi Sharma Masha Simonova, Lucia Radder and Samantha Fry and edited by us. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:39 am
James Hibberd of Entertainment Weekly asked him if it matters whether his portrayal of Hoffa’s death is true. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:51 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, on Wednesday, November 20, 2019 Tags: Agency costs, Disclosure, Institutional Investors, Political spending, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities regulation, Shareholder voting, Transparency Supreme Court Review of SEC’s Authority to Seek Disgorgement Posted by Greg Andres, Robert Cohen and Paul Nathanson, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Thursday, November 21, 2019 Tags: Disgorgement, Rule… [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 12:27 am
Top picture by CyberGhostics and is taken from Charles and Mary Lamb, Tales from Shakespeare (1901). [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
Lake Charles Am. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
By citing Charles’s case, Morris was trying to make the general point that guarding against a foreign power corrupting the president was an important matter to address—and the Founders agreed. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
Charles Black, Jr. [read post]
26 Oct 2019, 4:00 am
C.C.P. art. 966(B)(2). [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 7:15 am
During the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, Chief Justice William Rehnquist presided and ruled on several procedural matters. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 5:44 am
Adler Donald B. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 9:06 am
Landis & Loria B. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:21 pm
Attorney handing the matter to clearly identify you or your medical practice as such when issuing a Civil Investigative Demand. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
Leading treatises surmise that this "matter of emotion and sentiment" has, in fact, been "the prime influence in creating and maintaining" the spousal communication privilege. [read post]
