Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,889
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2007, 12:05 pm
Last Thursday, The Federalist Society hosted a debate about the Second Amendment with Professor Mark Tushnet, author of Out of Range: Why the Constitution Can't End the Battle Over Guns and Clark Neily, plaintiffs' counsel in Parker v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:54 am
Law Lessons from GAIL SCHMIDT V. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 5:00 am
In his recent decision in the breach of contract case of Clark v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 6:32 am
Neither IHOP nor Sunshine Partners exercised any control over employment-related matters at the specific IHOP restaurant, which was operated by a third entity, Clark Foods, which was a sub-franchisee of IHOP. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:46 am
I wanted to comment at least briefly, or more accurately thematically, on the Third Circuit’s decision last week in Santomenno v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
Clark did not see the intruders. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of… [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
It is well settled that, "when an employer and a union enter into a collective bargaining agreement that creates a grievance procedure, an employee subject to the agreement may not sue the employer directly for breach of that agreement but must proceed, through the union, in accordance with the contract" (Matter of Board of Educ., Commack Union Free School Dist. v Ambach, 70 NY2d 501, 508 [1987], cert denied 485 US 1034 [1988]; see Clark v County of… [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:26 pm
Clarke School of Law. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:50 pm
Twombly and Ashcroft v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:12 am
Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) — then it matters a great deal whether courts apply a sincere or an insincere standard of review. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:16 am
Monday’s argument in Lewis v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
In its decision in Clark v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:45 am
Running from Monday 16 July 2012 until Wednesday 18 July 2012 in the Supreme Court are the linked appeals of Day & anor v Hosebay Ltd and Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd, in front of a panel of seven (L Phillips,L Walker, L Mance, L Clarke, L Wilson, L Sumption and L Carnwath). [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:58 am
In Lane v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:41 am
V. [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:10 am
Law The House of Lord decisions in: Clarke v Edinburgh & District Tramways Co Ltd 1919 SC HL 35 and Thomas v Thomas 1947 SC (HL) 45 establish that a trial judge is in a superior position, having seen and heard the witnesses, to form a conclusion as to the credibility and reliability of those witnesses. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:03 am
Kindred Nursing Centers Limited Partnership v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
An Overview Of The Child Custody Case Timothy Cantrell v. [read post]
