Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 201 - 220
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
The Court of Appeal endorsed the decision of Ravenscoft v Herbert and New English Library Ltd [1980] RPC 193, where there was a finding of copyright infringement by the author of a novel who took a substantial part of a historical work, The Spear of Destiny. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:08 pm
The decision of the European Court of Justice in Svensson v Retriever Sverige AB (Case C‑466/12, 13 February 2014) has established some important points about the legality of linking under EU copyright law: A clickable direct link to a copyright work made freely available on the internet with the authority of the copyright holder does not infringe. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Tarapore & Co. [(1969) 3 SCC 562)], ONGC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:05 am
There, United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:45 am
The IPKat has received quite a few emails from readers wondering whether this blog will touch upon the matter. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:29 am
Just the previous week Lord Justice Floyd, who gave the leading judgment in this decision, gave the Herschel Smith Lecture. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am
Matthew Crow, Hobart and William Smith Colleges Freedom Bound: Law, Labor, and Civic Identity in Colonizing English America, 1580-1865. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 9:22 am
It referred to the decision of the English Court of Appeal in Howe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:53 pm
Prysock, 453 U.S. 355 (1981), and it didn't matter that the English warnings were OK.The decision is here:http://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/07/15/12-30074.pdfUnited States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 1:26 pm
Justice Smith, writing for the majority, in Sam v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:59 am
” • • • Redefining Free Culture was originally posted on Copyhype • • • FootnotesSee, for example, The Ethics of Consent, pp. 45-51 (Oxford University Press 2010), citing Thomas Hobbes, Adam Smith, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill.See, for example, Lynch v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
The Commission welcomed the newspaper’s efforts to resolve the matter, but upheld the complaint”. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 9:07 am
from Graham Smith The recent Donald Ashby (sub nom Ashby Donald) decision of the European Court of Human Rights has revived interest in the relationship between copyright and freedom of expression. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
The impugned statements fell squarely within the type of material identified in Myerson v Smith’s Weekly Publishing Co. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
The mother, whose first language was English, had some knowledge of French and wanted the children to receive education in both French and English as in a French immersion program. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
"This is a heartfelt plea to English matrimonial solicitors - please, please, be less polite. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 5:58 am
Mr Justice Smith, hearing the matter initially, dismissed the application on the grounds that a stay of the kind applied for should be granted only in rare and compelling circumstances, which were not present in this case. [read post]
