Search for: "Matter of Nixon C."
Results 201 - 220
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
But each largely makes four basic points: (a) The concept of executive privilege is hotly disputed; (b) there are very few relevant court cases and none that provide definitive answers; (c) there are a number of historical incidents, from the administration of George Washington to that of Barack Obama, that are of debatable—and contested—significance; and (d) the legal resolution of these highly disputed questions is likely of little practical significance. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:46 pm
This search was conducted after receipt of the subpoena, in order to locate any and all documents that are responsive to the subpoena; c. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
Nixon acknowledged in dicta, and Justice Department policy has asserted, that some national security information is also entitled to be withheld from disclosure as subject to executive privilege under Article II of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Bernards and their casks of brandy in the Alps, Pavlov’s conditioned-response subjects, Balto the hero sled-dog racing to the rescue in the Arctic, or, of course, the Nixon daughters’ little cocker spaniel Checkers? [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
Mitchell Pickerill and Adam C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
P. 166a(c); Browning v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:14 pm
Securities Litigation Blog Dealing with securities-related matters, and authored by attorneys John Jordak and Susan Hurd of Alston & Bird. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
As you suggest, I was fortunate to have studied with the late Professor C. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 6:47 pm
State, 959 So. 2d 702 (Fla. 2007), and Nixon v. [read post]
25 Dec 2014, 11:27 am
But he likely doesn’t meet the criteria to be tax exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 5:27 pm
Prior to his inauguration, President Trump threatened companies considering establishing plants outside the U.S. with a 35% tariff on their exports to the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
What the legislature ‘would have wanted’ it did not provide, and that is the end of the matter. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Those two cases were decided, it so happens, immediately after President Nixon repopulated the Court in the early 1970s.[11] That in itself is telling. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
P. 26(c)(1). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
c. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 6:18 am
Due to inflationary pressures, in August 1971, the Nixon administration imposed a pay and price “freeze” for a 90-day period. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:22 pm
Notwithstanding the protestations of Nixon Peabody, not everyone is a winner. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:09 am
Yesterday Ilyana Kuziemko came by to discuss her co-authored paper, Support for Redistribution in an Age of Rising Inequality. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
