Search for: "Meyer v. Law" Results 201 - 220 of 1,159
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2020, 11:47 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Most of the plaintiffs lose these cases on free speech grounds, and this case is no different.The case is Meyers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2020, 10:17 am by Eric Goldman
Ripoff Report gets easy Section 230 win in pro se lawsuit. * Meyers v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board, its determination must be sustained.As the Appellate Division determined that [1] Petitioner failed to demonstrate a “casual relationship” between the alleged service-related accident and the claimed disability and [2] there was credible evidence before the Board that Petitioner's injury was not caused by the alleged accident, it concluded that the Board’s determination should not be disturbed.*… [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
As long as there was any credible evidence of lack of causation before the Board, its determination must be sustained.As the Appellate Division determined that [1] Petitioner failed to demonstrate a “casual relationship” between the alleged service-related accident and the claimed disability and [2] there was credible evidence before the Board that Petitioner's injury was not caused by the alleged accident, it concluded that the Board’s determination should not be disturbed.*… [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 5:56 pm by Francis Pileggi
The March 17 opinion answered several certified questions of Delaware law posed by the United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit to help it decide whether to uphold the dismissal of an amended federal qui tam complaint against Sanofi, Bristol-Meyers Squibb Co. and Aventis, Inc. under the False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 8:13 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Coopers and Lybrand, 1978 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1979] 1 S.C.R. 495, at p. 503; Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 11:56 am by Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck
Population Services allowed a corporation selling contraceptives to challenge a law that prohibited nonpharmacists from selling contraceptives to people under the age of 16 (even though the corporation subject to the law was asserting the individuals’ right to contraception); Meyer v. [read post]