Search for: "Miner v. Miner" Results 201 - 220 of 2,308
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2023, 11:53 am
A pro-business entity -- the California Construction and Industrial Minerals Association -- sued, claiming that the ordinance was, among other things, inconsistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which, as you likely know, is a pro-environmental statute. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 3:33 pm
"To succeed, the children would have to prove that their father intended for Ingrid Hanrieder to give the mineral rights to his children, that he communicated his intentions to her, and that she accepted the obligation to give the mineral rights to his children.In Chinn v. [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:02 pm
The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 10:24 pm
., a seminal landmark preservation case, noted the passing last month of Dorothy Miner. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:32 am by Charles Sartain
Acme Energy Services, d/b/a Big Dog Drilling v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 4:30 am by Charles Sartain
So it was, I assume, for the parties in Midnight rilling, LLC v. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:53 am by WSLL
Case Name: TERRY MINER and COLLEEN MINER, Husband and Wife v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:43 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Osage Minerals Council, and Stand Up for California v. [read post]