Search for: "Murphy v. Light"
Results 201 - 220
of 401
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Yesterday, the court sent five Arizona cases challenging life-without-parole sentences of juvenile offenders back to the state courts for reconsideration in light of last term’s decision in Montgomery v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:46 am
Murphy, 552 F.3d 405 (U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
Murphy from the Erie, PA law firm of MacDonald, Illig, Jones & Britton. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Nov. 6, 2020) Murphy v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 10:17 am
Pritchard (1998), ‘United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
” In light of the chaos of the past few weeks, changes to the Presidential Transition Act might well be in order. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:31 pm
" In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 796–97 (4th Cir. 2018). [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:38 pm
§ 4B1.2, is unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 7:05 am
Nieves v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
But Tuesday’s case, Ramirez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
On 4 October 2011 the Court of Justice duly delivered its ruling in Joined Cases C-403/08 Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen and C-429/08 Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (see IPKat post here), following which Mr Justice Kitchin -- having metaphorically vanished as… [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
In its June 2014 decision in Halliburton Co. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:16 pm
See 3M Co. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:34 am
Loving v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:24 am
It is arguable that in the light of Enright, the validity of the pertinent section would be upheld on the basis of proportionality and consequentialist concern for public protection. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:54 am
” Murphy v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 7:56 am
Such is the high-profile case of an allegedly Nazi looted Modigliani leaked to have been stored in Geneva Freeport.[29]Maestracci v. [read post]
