Search for: "Network Apps, LLC" Results 201 - 220 of 473
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 6:46 am by Derrick Dominguez
This app enables attorneys to share their legal documents directly on their Facebook profile in a tab all its own. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am by Kristian Soltes
Epic Games CEO Cites Apple’s ‘Total Control’ Over iPhones at First Day of Antitrust TrialReuters – May 4, 2021 The chief executive of “Fortnite” creator Epic Games testified on Monday that he knew he was breaking Apple Inc’s (AAPL.O) App Store rules by putting Epic’s own in-app payment system into the game last year but wanted to highlight Apple’s sway over the world’s iPhone users, which now total 1 billion. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 8:56 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
LLC, 629 F.3d 1279, 1284-85 (Fed. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by Marie Louise
Negotiated Data Solutions Inc (EDTexweblog.com) Interval Licensing – Paul Allen’s infringement campaign halted by patent reexamination (Patents Post-Grant) Lodsys – App developer community invited to join Lodsys patent review (Article One Partners) Lodsys LLC – Apple intervenes in App patent suit: Lodsys LLC. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 7:31 am by The Editors
 Victor is a lawyer with the Medina Law Group, LLC and organizer of MILOfest, the only national conference specifically for Mac-using lawyers. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 7:24 am by Kristian Soltes
Integrity Business Partners LLC brought its accusations in a lawsuit that Worldpay removed to Ohio federal court on Friday. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 3:17 pm by Zak Gowen
—two of the seven big financial institutions that own Early Warning Services LLC, operator of the Zelle network—are lobbying to expand the service to retail payments. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:49 pm by Barry Sookman
App. 4th 974 (2014) Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb.Deutschland GmbH, CJEU, Case C‑322/14 (21 May, 2015) Small Justice LLC v Xcentric Ventures LLC (D.Mass Mar.27, 2015) Bank of Montreal v Rogozinsky, 2014 ABQB 771 Douez v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:02 am
App. 4th 790, 806 (2006), the California court of appeals found that when an employee used the employer’s computer network to send threatening messages, the employer was not liable. [read post]