Search for: "OSHA, Inc." Results 201 - 220 of 1,496
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am by Robert Kreisman
TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc., 72 N.E.3d 908, 913 (Ind.2017) and Hunt (Hunt Construction Group, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 3:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The press release also discussed the claims in both the OSHA complaint and this action and linked to both complaints. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
District Court for New Jersey for a permanent injunction against Little Falls, NJ-based Rainbow Foods Inc, and Robert Kalkan, its president. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
The mean ambient asbestos fiber (all types) concentration on ships has been measured to be 0.008 fibers/cubic centimeter, well below the current OSHA permissible exposure limit for asbestos.[13] Of course, these levels would be higher at times and places when the Navy required workers to maintain pumps, blowers, or turbines, but only the Navy would know what asbestos levels it was generating by its required work. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am by Schachtman
”[8] The Order went on to make OSHA regulations applicable to federal places of employment. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Of the 59 plaintiffs before the court in Beshada, 57 experienced their asbestos exposure in the course of employment for three large, sophisticated companies with substantial industrial hygiene technical capabilities: Jersey Central Power and Light Company, Hercules, Inc., and Research Cottrell, Inc.[7] One of these employers was a highly regulated utility, and all three were subject to state, and later federal, regulation of workplace asbestos exposure. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Austin B. Calhoun, Esq.
§ 661(g) (Commission proceedings conducted in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless Commission has adopted different rule); Branciforte Builders, Inc., 9 BNA OSHC 2113, 2117 (No. 80-1920, 1981) (late notice of contest may be excused under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)); Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:47 am by Austin B. Calhoun, Esq.
§ 661(g) (Commission proceedings conducted in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure unless Commission has adopted different rule); Branciforte Builders, Inc., 9 BNA OSHC 2113, 2117 (No. 80-1920, 1981) (late notice of contest may be excused under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)); Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 8:03 am by Schachtman
” According to Schepers’ letter, he was following up on his recent meeting with Wrenn, by sending represents and copies of articles on asbestos and beryllium, which were under intense scrutiny from OSHA at the time. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:29 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Under the FLSA, temperature checks seem most analogous to time spent on security screenings (or bag checks), which has been held noncompensable under the FLSA under the Supreme Court’s 2014 Integrity Staffing Sols., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:46 am by Joy Waltemath
Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., Keystone Foods, LLC, JBS USA, Inc., and Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. adopted their respective policies after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States on or about March 11, 2020, the complainants assert. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 9:16 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Earlier this week, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) announced that employee benefit plan participants that already took a required minimum distribution (RMD) in 2020 from certain retirement accounts now has the opportunity through August 31, 2020 to roll those funds back into a retirement account following the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act RMD waiver for 2020. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 11:28 am by Brett Holubeck
Refusal to Perform An Illegal Act A Texas Supreme Court case called Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. [read post]