Search for: "Oklahoma Employment Law Letter" Results 201 - 220 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 9:50 am by HR Hero Alerts
Charlie Plumb is an editor of Oklahoma Employment Law Letter and a partner in the Tulsa office of McAfee & Taft. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am by Rebecca Shafer, J.D.
Letter Carrier Fraud, Delivering the Mail Goes To the Dogs. 2. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
Employment Law: There are many aspects that deal with employment law, but contract disputes or wage issues are often some of the most common. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:54 am by CJLF Staff
The two daughters were rescued by law enforcement. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 8:55 am by Wendi Watts
For more information, see the August 2011 issue of Oklahoma Employment Law Letter. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:30 pm by Brian Tamanaha
It is by now well known that law schools have been posting misleading employment numbers. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
  I am pleased that today's announcement offers some good news for Oklahoma and the nation. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Brian Tamanaha
Hofstra, Oklahoma City, and Dayton suffered net losses of more than 7 percent. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 12:39 pm by HR Hero Alerts
Keep up with the latest developments in Texas employment law with the Texas Employment Law Letter [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 5:29 am by Jayne Sykora
However, I had a limited license to practice law in Oklahoma from February 2007 until I was sworn in as an attorney. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 12:49 pm by Mike Scarcella
Born on a farm in Oklahoma, the youngest of 13 siblings, Hill received her law degree from Yale in 1980. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 6:00 am by Frank Pasquale
Once an educator, employer, landlord, banker, or insurer makes a decision based on that data, the affected individual should be able to challenge and correct it. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:16 pm by Frank Pasquale
Once an educator, employer, landlord, banker, or insurer makes a decision based on that data, the affected individual should be able to challenge and correct it. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
After years of fighting, there is simply no guarantee a full repeal would be signed into law. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:31 am by Robin E. Shea
Essentially, the Court said that the union was justified because the plaintiff had three no-rehire letters in his file from three separate ex-employers. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 Though the defendant showed the letter only to the plaintiff’s agent, the plaintiff showed the letter to potential employers. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 11:23 am by Donna
So those letters employees sometimes do to complain against unfair treatment or bullying are supposed to be protected. [read post]