Search for: "P. v. House"
Results 201 - 220
of 3,751
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2012, 8:55 am
Smith, 02-1842, p. 1 (La. 9/20/02), 827 So. 2d 1122, 1123 (per curiam); State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am
Not only was it concerned with the Housing (Homeless Persons) Act 1977, rather than the provisions of the Housing Act 1996, the determination of the House of Lords in R v LB of Harrow ex p. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:11 pm
First, the court found there was sufficient evidence to support constructive possession of the firearms when they were found in the corner of the front room of the house and Johnson admitted he had been selling drugs out of the house. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 11:31 am
Awua (R (ex p Awua) v Brent LBC [1996] 1 A.C. 55) did not help Birmingham because the accommodation in that case was acceptable albeit short life housing. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
In Burton v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:57 am
Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 6 As if to confirm that housing law is, well, complicated, there is a coda to the Supreme Court decision in Manchester City Council v Pinnock, which has led to a supplementary judgment being handed down. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
This appears for example at paragraph 67 of the judgment of Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] 1 FLR 1246 (Charman (No 4)) where he says:“… the starting point of every inquiry in an application of ancillary relief is the financial position of the parties. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 1:17 pm
Politico: Democrats in Pennsylvania won the majority of seats in the state House this fall, powered by voter backlash to the fall of Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:53 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 4:50 am
In Michigan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 12:53 pm
The Michigan Court of Appeals issued a per curiam opinion in AFSCME v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 9:29 am
Judge Graber, joined by Judges Gould and Watford, in No on E, San Franciscans Opposing the Affordable Housing Production Act v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 5:22 am
I’m a big P! [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 5:44 am
But that violates the First Amendment; as Reed v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
P. 26(b)(3)(A); Notes of Advisory Committee on Rules—1970 Amendment; 8 FED. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 1:43 pm
See, Tyus v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
Want to know how the huge credit crisis -- or at least a large part of it (the housing part) -- got started? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Erica P. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:05 pm
Pacific Plaza Shopping Center] (1993) 6 Cal.4th 666 and Sharon P. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:08 am
The Report and Recommendation correctly rejects this argument (Doc. #205, p. 29, n.6). [read post]
