Search for: "Page v State of New York"
Results 201 - 220
of 4,285
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
(Yesterday, Samantha Barbas present on her book, Actual Malice: Civil Rights and Freedom of the Press in New York Times v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Further, said the court, "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" and "An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" (see Matter of Bolt v New York City Dept. of… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Further, said the court, "Judicial review of an administrative penalty is limited to whether the measure or mode of penalty or discipline imposed constitutes an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" and "An administrative penalty must be upheld unless it is so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" (see Matter of Bolt v New York City Dept. of… [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
My prior op-eds in the New York Times, of course, garnered much more attention than that. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 3:37 pm
From McCollum v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Similarly, such time would be excluded from any speedy trial calculation in New York. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 7:55 am
But New York, Pennsylvania and Hawaii do, so these courtroom lessons are applicable for future trials there. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:34 am
With that appetite in mind, I’m delighted to blog about a recent decision from New York County Commercial Division Justice Jennifer Schecter, Rosenthal v Erber, No. 650771/2021 (Sup Ct, NY County 2023). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 2:01 pm
What’s worse, in quoting and citing two pages of an article I wrote in the Harvard Law Review, the Memorandum makes me stand for the outlandish proposition that, whatever Congress might say and whatever the State’s chief executive might have certified as its official Electoral Slate, any State is free to continue “recounting” the votes cast in that State’s presidential election until January 6, two weeks before the impending… [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 5:04 am
The 92nd Street Y, New York City. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
However, a public adjusting firm in New York City, Goldstein Affiliates, learned of his fire and offered to assist. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
" Citing Matter of Gulotta v New York State Thruway Auth., 174 AD3d 1205, the majority of the court, Lynch, J. dissenting, opined that the penalty of termination "is so disproportionate to the offense and shockingly unfair as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" under the circumstances. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:17 am
" Citing Matter of Gulotta v New York State Thruway Auth., 174 AD3d 1205, the majority of the court, Lynch, J. dissenting, opined that the penalty of termination "is so disproportionate to the offense and shockingly unfair as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law" under the circumstances. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 10:23 am
From Trump v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 10:17 am
No, not New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
District Court for Oregon issued a 122-page opinion, styled Oregon Firearms Federation v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Dist. of the City of New York, 2022 WL 797971 [Sup Ct, New York County 2022, Kotler, J.]; Matter of Bryan v The Bd. of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
State of California, IHSS, legally uninsured, administered by York Risk Services Group, a Sedgwick Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
Frankly, from what I read, there was nothing new in the majority argument. [read post]