Search for: "Peer v. Superior Court"
Results 201 - 220
of 269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 12:49 pm
The agreements between collecting societies and some content sharing platforms do not, as of now, secure these practices " (Part. 1 p. 36).French Law “Awkward” at Grasping Transformative WorksAs explained by the Report, the term “transformative” originated in U.S. fair use case law, particularly the Supreme Court Campbell v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:00 am
Supreme Court, reinstated the entire $75.9 million punitive damages award that the Court had overturned nearly one year earlier in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Superior Court, 13 Cal.4th 1104, 56 Cal. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 5:41 am
He relied on "the principles laid down in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
CPF-10-510191 San Francisco City & County Superior. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 6:02 am
Her direct supervisor entered the bathroom, peered through the cracks of the stall, asked the plaintiff if she was expressing milk, reiterated that she was not allowed to do so, and ordered her out of the stall. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:40 pm
Arnstein v. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 6:24 am
Summary judgment against her Title VII sex discrimination claim was affirmed (Cox v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
It was also a marathon by the standards of a normal private Peers’ Friday: following are some snippets. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
A&M Records, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm
Meeker, lacking in medical expertise, but his article was non-peer-reviewed (for what little good that would have done) and his opinion did not cite any foundational evidence or data in an appropriate scientific study. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:24 am
The ARB agreed with the ALJ’s observation that that “other than asserting six years has passed since the case was filed, reminding the Court of its superior work product, and citing distinguishable cases that preceded the Purdue [sic] Court’s decision, Counsel has done nothing to justify the enhancement. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am
In a complaint filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on January 13, 2012, Bostwick alleges that certain SB 94 provisions, “as applied and enforced by the State Bar, violate both the United States and California constitutions. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:06 am
The Un-Royal Treatment of the Crypto King A recent case from the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, while dealing with a strange and unique case, reconfirmed the law on setting aside an Agreement of Purchase and Sale where the seller has made a fraudulent misrepresentation, or where there is a latent defect in the property. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:20 am
In Gamoff v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Phillips of the bar of the district of Columbia, of counsel), Sidley Austin LLP, London, UK (Tanisha Singh of counsel), Peer Defense Project, New York (Sarah Medina Camiscoli of counsel), and Public Counsel, Los Angeles, CA (Mark D. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Sierra Club v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 6:28 am
Summary judgment was also affirmed on his retaliation claim (Denn v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
