Search for: "People v Brett" Results 201 - 220 of 944
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2022, 8:52 am by jonathanturley
., joined the growing ranks of members of Congress in issuing a warning to the Supreme Court: reaffirm Roe v. [read post]
On the assumption that five Supreme Court Justices—Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—are prepared to overrule Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
A man drove a car into a crowd of people in Berlin, killing one person and leaving multiple injured, according to DW. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 9:49 am
Two people familiar with the investigation said the initial evidence indicates that the man was angry about the leaked draft of an opinion by the Supreme Court signaling that the court is preparing to overturn Roe. v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
  If a claimant has lied in their pleadings or evidence, they could face contempt proceedings or a prosecution for perjury – rare, but not unheard of (see R v Jeffrey Archer and R v Jonathan Aitkin). [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Blog has an article commenting on the case and the perils of life-streaming and trial by TikTok. [read post]
18 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
That was the knock, of course, on the infamous (and thoroughly discredited) Bush v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:41 am by SHG
We want people to protest peacefully if they want to protest. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:20 am by Tom Goldstein
In substance, it was that the court had voted to overrule Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The draft decision, which Politico published on Monday night [May 2, 2022], would overturn Roe v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 2:34 pm by Ben Sperry
As Justice Brett Kavanaugh put it on behalf of the Court in Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]