Search for: "People v. Blake" Results 201 - 220 of 278
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2010, 3:47 pm by Steve Bainbridge
" Indeed, many people will be unable to afford to defend a libel suit even if it's completely meritless. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:43 pm
  Justice Scalia - author of Blakely v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 10:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The criminal charges were brought four years after a Salmonella outbreak associated with PCA products sickened more than 700 people and killed nine. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
14 May 2008, 6:10 pm
Stan Blake was his usual ebullient self. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
Washington, 2004), sentencing facts for the jury (Blakely v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am by INFORRM
The ICO has fined two home improvement companies for marketing phone calls to people on the UK’s “do not call” register. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  Under our system, it’s the jury, a conclusion reinforced by the decisions in the Apprendi/Blakely line. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
Kiwi Farms has had a well-documented history of sparking campaigns of doxing, often targeting LBGTQ+ people. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But Dinan focuses on something even more important about most of the states: With only one exception (Delaware), they reject what Madison was so proud of in Federalist 63, i.e., the removal from “we the people” of even an iota of an ability to engage in direct governance. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:13 am by INFORRM
However, concerns have been raised by the Ada Lovelace Institute that the use of AI in the public sector “will have real-world impacts on people” and barrister Susie Allegre has warned of the “dangers of putting too much faith in technology without the resources for effective accountability. [read post]