Search for: "People v. Goldsmith" Results 201 - 220 of 273
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 1:22 am by Melina Padron
Preston, R (on the application of) v Wandsworth Borough Council & Anor [2011] EWHC 3174 (Admin) (01 December 2011) December 1, 2011 High Court: Removal of voting rights for people who leave UK for over 15 years not contrary to EU freedom of movement law, although could in principle if rules “unjustifiably interfere with the freedom of movement”. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 9:20 am by Monica Bay
There are few people who can put up with me for 10-hours straight, but we both had a great time. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Eleonora Maria Mazzoli argues that, in a world where social media and search engines have become integral to how people find and access information and news online, an approach focused on a negative rights philosophy is insufficient. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The LSE Media Blog has an article on recent findings of an evidence review on young people’s digital literacy, online resilience and wellbeing, conducted as part of research for the ySKILLS project. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
  Newspapers Journalism and Regulation The Evening Standard has consistently leaned in favour of the Conservative mayoral candidate Zac Goldsmith, according to research by the Media Reform Coalition and Goldsmiths, University of London. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 5:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Much of the commentary around on Trump’s proposed national emergency has focused on the framework set out in Justice Robert Jackson’s deservedly famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Kenneth also flagged the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Jesner v. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am by William Ford
Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck dissected the Supreme Court’s landmark 1952 decision in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The AP has more on the humanitarian costs of the siege, including the 16,000 people displaced from the latest operation. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero outlined a few quick thoughts on making national security arguments in court based on Washington v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Tinkler v Ferguson The case of Tinkler -v- Ferguson [2018] EWHC 3563 (QB) concerned a claim by a director of Stobart Group Limited (“Stobart”), against five other members of Stobart’s board of directors of that company. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm by Aaron Moss
Goldsmith, Western District of Pennsylvania District Judge Stephanie L. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 11:20 am by Deborah Pearlstein
Jack Goldsmith has been making that causal claim on the speaking circuit for his new book, Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency After 9/11. [read post]