Search for: "People v. Nations" Results 201 - 220 of 18,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm by Josh Blackman
Justice Gorsuch's concurrence pointed out: Members of this Court have long held that, "'[a]nytime a State is enjoined by a court from effectuating statutes enacted by representatives of its people, it suffers a form of irreparable injury.'" Maryland v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
Oyate Health Center (Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
People have a right to publicly say "Putin, keep up the good fight against Ukraine" (or, in an earlier era, "Sandinistas, keep up the good fight against the contras") even though that would be aimed at defeating U.S. policy. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am by Barry Barnett
By coopting people and things that would disrupt their dominance. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:14 am by Dylan Gibbs
Before the Charter, First Nations could sue for breach of contract (at least in theory). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:06 am
Supreme Court streams live audio of oral arguments, New York is way behind the times; the official court rules for coverage of People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Read the National Union of Journalists summary here. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm by Hugh Rennie
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
As Professor Mazzone and I explained in our column, the Court’s decision came down to the Court’s seeming belief in the need for a meaningful level of ballot uniformity across the nation, given that people in all states have input in choosing the President, as well as the President’s role as chief executive for the entire nation. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm by Gary J. Simson
The Code gives the other Justices no authority to order him not to sit, but that doesn’t mean they are powerless to try to stop him from wreaking havoc on the reputation of the Court.Because of people’s already much-depleted confidence in the Court, and because of all that’s at stake for the nation in Trump v. [read post]