Search for: "People v. Newer"
Results 201 - 220
of 287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 2:11 pm
In Maples v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:08 am
A similar situation in Philadelphia last year resulted in the district attorney offering new trials to nearly 1,500 people who had been convicted of driving under the influence over the previous 15 months. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 9:50 am
See Vale v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 12:48 pm
Raymond Randolph, has likened the Justices in the majority in Boumediene to fictional characters in The Great Gatsby, “careless people” making messes for other people to clean up. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:40 am
Make yourself available to those who may be newer to the career field. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:01 pm
Build a bigger, newer Death Star to serve as a target for the Rebel Alliance. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:19 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:45 pm
This notion of unlawful search was based on the common law notion of trespass, as understood by the drafters of the Constitution, rather than the newer Katz v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
No. 09–0724 CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT and EMC INSURANCE COMPANIES v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:17 am
Consumers who try to optimize for current technology are required to learn the newer technology. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
With this in mind, we’ve decided to reprint this article written by Edward V. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am
It’s not hard to find support for that view if you compare United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
In the recent case of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:11 am
So if you wanted to send a link to Crawford v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:47 pm
At issue before the Court of Appeals recently was the question whether a defendant could - by sacrificing an illegally lenient sentence on a prior conviction - remove a predicate conviction by effectively moving his conviction date from before the current crime was comhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifmitted to after.The answer under the facts in this case was no (People v Acevedo, 2011 NY Slip Op 05582 [decided June 30, 2011]). [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 1:50 pm
And the end came just after Richard found a newer will that would have assured him victory. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:42 am
In the newer case of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm
I always tell newer people who are just learning the field, we are not computers, we are artists. [read post]
6 May 2011, 7:16 am
But when we do have both sides available to us, we present them.In the case of the People v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:49 pm
Most people means most plaintiffs. [read post]
