Search for: "People v. Price (1989)"
Results 201 - 220
of 235
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1989) (noting that the precise methodology used in "assessing and computing damages is committed to the sound discretion of the district court"). [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 9:07 am
The value of a publicly listed company can be determined at any given moment based on the traded price of the stock. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am
The philosophy underlying the disallowance of one or both DLOM and DLOC under the statutory FV standard was expressed as well as anywhere by the Delaware Supreme Court in its 1989 ruling in the Cavalier Oil case, where it wrote: Discounting individual share holdings injects into the appraisal process speculation on the various factors which may dictate the marketability of minority shareholdings. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The carp are dangerous to the eco-system, people, and property. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The tenant protections provided by the State's rent regulation laws have long been an essential measure to ensuring New York City accommodates people with a broad range of incomes, and today's decision means fewer units will fall out of the system than otherwise would have. [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
Introduction[1] I want to acknowledge the traditional owners of this land, the Turrbal people. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:18 pm
American Bush v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 4:01 am
”[10] The issue of “healing” is effectively discarded in R. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am
Were all politicians prostitutes of corporate interests, whatever that is, in 1989? [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:11 pm
Were all politicians prostitutes of corporate interests, whatever that is, in 1989? [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
”[ii] Judges, like most people, glibly assumed that what people normally or customarily do is reasonable. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 8:05 pm
In Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am
This is particularly pertinent to the assessment of women, children and indigenous people as victims of eco-anxiety. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
Inco was for many years the major employer in the Port Colborne area, employing as many as 2,000 people. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
And it ruled in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 5:05 am
Kats, 871 F.2d 105 (9th Cir. 1989); United States v. [read post]
