Search for: "Person v. General Motors Corp." Results 201 - 220 of 533
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm by Marx Sterbcow
General Motors Acceptance Corp., 296 F.3d 443, 449 (6th Cir.2002) (“[T]he primary justification for class treatment ... is largely absent because [the statute's] provision for the award of attorney's fees and costs to successful plaintiffs eliminates any potential financial bar to pursuing individual claims. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
R&L established prima facie that it provided the advice expected of legal counsel exercising ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge and that it did not breach any duty toward plaintiffs (see Nomura Asset Capital Corp. v Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, 26 NY3d 40, 49-50 [2015]). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
General Motors Corp., 977 F.2d 369, 372 (7th Cir. 1992) (internal quotation marks and alteration omitted). [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:34 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court of Appeal overturned this position on the basis of a new Supreme Court of Canada decision in Pioneer Corp. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:57 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Honda Motor Corp., 651 F.3d 1318, 1341 (Fed. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:55 am by Larry
The relevant case for that analysis is Marubeni America Corp. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:49 am by MBettman
Motors Corp., 117 Ohio St.3d 192, 2008-Ohio-546, 883 N.E.2d 377 (Upholding products liability statute of repose, finding statutes of repose do not automatically violate the Ohio Constitution’s right-to-remedy provision. [read post]
9 May 2011, 10:11 am by @ErikJHeels
* Electromotive Division of General Motors Corp. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 12:56 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
General Motors Corp., a 1968 case in which a plaintiff suffered severe injuries when the steering column in his Chevrolet Corvair thrust backwards during a head-on collision, striking him in the head. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
”  Ford Motor Credit Co. v. [read post]