Search for: "Person v. New York Post Corp." Results 201 - 220 of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court said that the statute authorizing the municipality to contract with BGVAC, New York Town Law §198(10-f), imposes no duty, obligation, or responsibility on New York towns to provide emergency medical services. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 3:07 am by Peter Mahler
Prior to New York’s adoption in the late 1970′s of a statutory remedy for minority shareholder oppression under § 1104-a of the Business Corporation Law, a minority shareholder alleging squeeze-out or other coercive conduct by controlling shareholders was limited to a common-law claim for dissolution which, as somewhat amorphously articulated by New York’s highest court in Leibert v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:00 am
The “personnel records” exemption set out in Civil Rights Law §50-a (1) applies to both active and former employees of the agency Hearst Corp. v New York State Police, 2013 NY Slip Op 03900, Appellate Division, Third Department Supreme Court dismissed the Hearst Corporation’s [Hearst] appeal of an administrative decision denying its Freedom of Information [FOIL] request for “all records” maintained by the Division of State… [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78  proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
The Motor Vehicle Accident, Death and TextingThis post examines a recent opinion the Supreme Court -Genesee County, New York issued in a civil case: Vega v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:25 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(“Burnham”) based in New York, New York, and his son, Jason Galanis, to serve as the Placement Agent in the WLCC Bond offerings. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
New York courts have recognizedthat using a "lookalike" of a well-known personality for commercial purposes is a violation of New York Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51. [read post]