Search for: "Protective Committee v. Anderson"
Results 201 - 220
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2018, 4:50 am
David Anderson Q.C.'s (now Lord Anderson) Bulk Powers Reviewrecords (para 2.26(g)) an assurance given by the Home Office that that authority is inherent in clauses 205 and 211 of the Bill (now sections 229 and 235 of the IP Act). [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The debate about whether the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council should continue to be the final appellate court for New Zealand rose from time to time over nearly a century and with greater vigour following the lead of Canada and Australia in abolishing rights of appeal to it. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am
Schiff, Committee for Public Counsel Services, for Committee for Public Counsel Services, amicus curiae, submitted a brief. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 2:41 pm
However, in an email to Forbes, an “advisor” to the California Attorney General seemingly made it clear that the office intends to stick with the enforcement deadline of July 1, further issuing a stern warning to California businesses: “We’re all mindful of the new reality created by COVID-19 and the heightened value of protecting consumers’ privacy online that comes with it. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
. - Chris Anderson, South Coast Today, March 4, 2010 City officials are pushing for the remaining funds in the New Bedford Harbor trust to be allocated to city projects, arguing that the money should be spent as close as possible to where the damage from the long-running contamination of the harbor occurred. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am
.: The House Permanent Select Committee will hold the first public hearing of the impeachment inquiry. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:25 am
Hutchison v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
But obstruction of Congress is now all but certain to be introduced as well, just as it was five decades ago when the House Judiciary Committee voted for articles of impeachment against then-President Richard Nixon. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:42 pm
FDA then asks the National Advisory Committee for Microbiological Criteria for Food (NACMCF) to re-examine the literature on the efficacy of 60-day aging. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 8:53 pm
Departmental Committee to Inquire into the Definition of Silicosis & Chest Diseases (Oosthuizen) Departmental Committee at 23 (1954)). [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:02 pm
Courts have concluded that all employees, and not just individuals with qualifying disabilities, are entitled to this ADA protection. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
In addition to regulating behavior during armed conflict, Protocols II and V, specifically, require parties to a conflict to take specific measures post-conflict to reduce the dangers posed by mines, booby traps, and other forms of unexploded and abandoned ordnance. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
I've suggested a few possible parallels in the legal world, but hopefully the Senate Judiciary Committee (perhaps with your help?) [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 7:35 am
To address these concerns, Family Voices sends health information to more than 200 families, serves on the Medicaid Quality Improvement Committee, and works closely with the ICC, Title V/CSHCN, parent and mental health groups, and other child and disability advocacy organizations. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
Consider these data points.[13] In the 2009 calendar year, C-SPAN provided the following amount of first run programming across their three channels: 8,438 overall hours of programming; 2,709 hours of House & Senate floor activity; and, 1,222 hours of House & Senate committee hearings. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
He served as Investigative Counsel on the House Select Committee, where he was a lead counsel on the committee's investigations into domestic extremism and social media's role in the attempted insurrection. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
The 1999 Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which considered allegations that NATO forces breached the proportionality rule in the Kosovo war, summarized the difficulties even under the law today:"The main problem with the principle of proportionality is not whether or not it exists but what it means and how it is to be applied. [read post]
