Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent"
Results 201 - 220
of 354
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Assistance & Health Servs. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm
The service-letter statute aimed to prevent this and to require employers to provide a true statement of the reasons for dismissal, enforced by the statute on the one side and the risk of defamation liability for false statements on the other. [5].Wallace, 22 S.E. at 579. [6].138 S. [read post]
29 Jan 2023, 6:33 am
“Require or recommend the respondent to undergo counseling for a specified duration with a social worker, psychologist, clinical psychologist, psychiatrist, family service agency, alcohol or substance abuse program, mental health center guidance counselor, agency providing services to elders, program designed for domestic violence abusers or any other guidance service the court deems appropriate. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
Third Department Affirms Initial Custody Award Made without Evidentary Hearing In Matter of Cole v Cole, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 4975299, 2011 N.Y. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
On February 1, a unanimous five-judge panel of the New York State Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which is based in Buffalo, ruled in Martinez v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”). [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:30 am
Department of Health and Human Services, 14-1453; Zubik v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Attorney's fees -- Action arising from Department of Administrative Hearings' finding that AHCA's withdrawal of an application for a home health care facility license, due to what the AHCA perceived as an incomplete application, was incorrect -- Error to award applicant attorney's fees and costs pursuant to section 57.111 despite favorable order from DOAH -- Where, at the time the withdrawal… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The petitioners argued that there were unusual circumstances due to “the inherently noxious and controversial nature of a portion of Planned Parenthood’s services” which would cause significant environmental impacts (traffic, parking, public health and safety, noise, etc.) due to protests that would occur as a result of the approval. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
ARMIGER, Appellant, v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:34 am
Nor does the contract require the Government to provide [Pernix Serka] with direction on how to respond to the Ebola outbreak. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Progressive denied payment of plaintiff provider's bills for psychological testing , a diagnostic interview, individual psychotherapy and other services it provided to the assignor based on a peer review report of Dr. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
GRIMSLEY, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
The Facebook post made its way to the health centre’s board of directors, and even the regional health authority. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, heard 7 Jun 2018. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
Luke's Hospital under his Services Agreement and not an employee.EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust, heard 7 Jun 2018. [read post]
