Search for: "Providence Health & Services, Appellant V. Department Of Health, Respondent" Results 201 - 220 of 354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Cortland County Department of Social Services, 186 AD2d 908 [3d Dept 1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 706 [1993]). [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 8:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court must decide if the Air Quality Directive requires the respondent to have prepared an air quality plan which demonstrates compliance by 1 January 2015 and what remedies it should provide where the respondent has not prepared a plan. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Americans trying to predict how the Supreme Court will rule on King v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 4:15 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the amicus brief that he filed on behalf of former officials of the Department of Health and Human Services in Armstrong v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
To deny Anonymous' request for a post-termination hearing was constitutionally infirm and, therefore, remittal of this matter is necessary for the completion of such administrative proceedings,” citing House v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 262 AD2d 929.* Although the phrase used in the decision is "be discharged from his position," such termination is not a pejorative dismissal as §73, in pertinent part, specifically provides that an… [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
But, it had also failed him because of deeply entrenched practices and biases.[7][…] The Commission found that “each component of the system—every check and balance-failed from the Sydney Police Force to the Department of the Attorney General”. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
California Department of Fish and Game and Sierra Club v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Instead, as the First Department summarized, it provided the Board of Health with a memorandum summarizing and responding to the written comments. [read post]