Search for: "Quick v. Department of Justice" Results 201 - 220 of 674
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm by Richard Hunt
Mar. 3, 2020) is the latest in a series of decisions in the long-running dispute between two group homes, the Department of Justice and the City of Springfield. [read post]
9 May 2011, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  She added that the paper was due in a few days, so a quick response would be appreciated. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Justice Gorsuch, has described that method, articulated in the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am by Orin Kerr
 The Justice Department did not raise the good faith exception in either case. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
United States The Justice Department’s Civil Division told a federal appellate court that it will continue to try and defend former President Donald Trump in a libel suit brought by E. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 3:00 am by Jay Levine
Not surprisingly, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) and plaintiffs’ bar have been pushing for an expansive reading of the law so that more such sales would be governed by American antitrust law. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am by Kenneth Anderson
 Third, let’s mention, in light of the criticisms of Justice Department lawyers involved in detainee cases, the exceedingly tough government argument is under signature of … Neal Katyal. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Bash, a supporting lawyer from the Justice Department. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
Election-law specialist and Loyola Law School professor Rick Hasen was quick to gin up this interesting take on the ruling. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The Department of Justice Antitrust Division and Federal Trade Commission issued new draft Merger Guidelines on July 19 that aim to significantly increase scrutiny of merger activity. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm by Richard Hunt
The Department of Justice has appeared to support him in one of the cases, Gil v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
Secondly, who will replace the other departing justices and how vulnerable are these judicial appointments to political intervention? [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
” The goal of this initiative was to enhance the public’s understanding of the criminal justice process. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:39 am
The offending passage occurred in the judge’s dissent in Jones v. [read post]