Search for: "R. B. vs B. T."
Results 201 - 220
of 743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2011, 8:39 pm
Can law firm represent Party A in a contract dispute with Party B, when long-since-departed Attorney of law firm negotiated the contract on behalf of Party B, didn’t speak with anyone else at the firm before / during / after, and took all the files with him when he left? [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 7:25 am
Race-Based Discrimination vs. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 8:53 pm
Republicans should be reminding people of the promise vs. the delivery. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Letter vs. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Over two years ago I posted about a decision by Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Emily Pines in a father vs. son corporate dissolution case called Matter of Wenger. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
R. 5. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 10:51 am
Defendants need to make sure to plead the exception (it apparently doesn’t fall within Rule 1030(b)), which as the court noted, can be pleaded in the alternative. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
Sénécal n'est pas avocat mais plutôt professeur en marketing. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
Sines also contended that its “inventory vs. use expansion” would neither increase traffic, nor create any concern for the health, safety or welfare of the community. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 10:59 am
R. [read post]
24 May 2012, 11:13 am
§§ 25.2601(b), 25.2606. [read post]
24 May 2020, 11:21 pm
FIRST DEFENSE (word) – judgment of 29 November 2012 (cases T-537/10 and T-538/10): and FAGUMIT (word) vs. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:32 am
On the other, it can't be too narrow or else become toothless. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The reasons set out in the impugned decision, according to which the opposition was filed belatedly are not objectionable, as will be explained in what follows.Provisions to be applied (EPC 1973 vs. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:42 am
The attorneys who survive this trend will be those who (a) abandon this market altogether, in favor of higher level services (e.g, "asset protection" vs. "simple Wills") or offer services where the hands-on advice and ongoing involvement of an attorney is mandated, or (b) get very good, and very creative, at marketing and finding under-served niche markets where they can carve out market share. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
El argumento básico de la Corte es el art. 27 de la Convención de Viena, según el cual "Una parte no podrá invocar las disposiciones de su derecho interno como justificación del incumplimiento de un tratado", lo que a criterio del tribunal "impone a los órganos del Estado argentino asignar primacía al tratado ante un eventual conflicto con cualquier norma interna contraria o con la omisión de dictar disposiciones… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
The answer isn’t quite as intuitive. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 2:28 pm
It does matter practically, but shouldn't. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm
Justice Karmeier asked counsel to respond to the appellant’s point about the statute using custodial vs. non-custodial. [read post]
