Search for: "RA v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2015, 8:51 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Alfonso Rodriguez v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 2:33 pm
Levando em conta que não existe descontinuidade entre o social e o humano e as suas raízes biológicas. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:44 am
State media During the first K term, the government began to manage state media as if it were a party organ. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Darius Whelan
  Ireland is not directly tackling the problem of the "Bournewood gap" and ECHR case-law such as H.L. v UK; Stanev v Bulgaria; D.D. v Lithuania and other cases.RecommendationThe IMHLA recommends that the Bill should state that if a person is being admitted to any residential centre, this can only occur on a voluntary basis, where the person has capacity to consent to such admission and does consent to such admission. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Farrell, and Susana Gomez Case number: 13-cv-01865 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: August 13, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 14, 2012 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-104 In the Matter of RA Capital Management, LLCAdministrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Inside Privacy
 Andrus Ansip is nominally the “team leader” on the reforms, with Věra Jourová, Günther Oettinger and Dimitris Avramopoulos competing to be heard on the balance between fundamental rights, business freedoms and the powers of public authorities (e.g. state surveillance), respectively. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The Pentagon also provided detail into the state of Kobani itself, with Rear Adm. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am by Shari Shapiro
  However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am by Shari Shapiro
  However, the recent Supreme Court decision in Utility Regulatory Group v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Supreme Court’s decision sets out the following events leading to this litigation: [1] The Illinois State Labor Relations Board, in 1985, stated that “[t]here is no typical employment arrangement here, public or otherwise; rather, there simply exists an arrangement whereby the State of Illinois pays [RAs] . [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:02 am
Himphill, Laqua Pollard, and Ra Shabazz. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Mauldin et al.[10] It was argued on the basis of the “full appreciation” test stated by the Court of Appeal in Combined Air Mechanical v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:43 am by INFORRM
 By way of comparison, the last Chamber Article 10 judgment considered by the Grand Chamber was in the case of Mouvement raëlien suisse v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:48 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, the lower court relied on the testimony of the president of RAS that RAS believed liquidation was appropriate. [read post]