Search for: "Ruiz v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2023, 8:36 am
United States (D. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
" Iron Grip, 392 F.3d at 1323; Ruiz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:31 pm
Perhaps as a result, (4) most places within the United States have abandoned its use. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 7:23 am
The military judge ascends and calls United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has just been reportedly faced with a case of alleged nepotism on the part of one of its Commissioners, the outcome being reported by the Washington Times (here, with a katpat to Chris Torrero for the link). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am
Cir. 2008) (quoting Ruiz v. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
McLean & V. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 4:41 pm
In a case styled Enmund v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
Slip Op. 06460 (1st Dept.,2021) the Appellate Division held that Family Court could exercise subject matter jurisdiction in this family offense proceeding notwithstanding that the offenses occurred out of state (see Opportune N. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
Otherwise, they'd essentially just be leaving some units unguarded, or more likely "guarded" by "building tenders" (inmate enforcers), like back in the bad old days, pre-William Wayne Justice and Ruiz v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:45 am
1968’s Larsen v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 3:29 am
They have also cited our repeated use of the word "references" in the following list from Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
It contravenes the duly enacted substantive law of the United States. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Government Ordered to Maintain Expensive Custom Database Shared with Criminal Defendant: In the criminal case of United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:14 am
Starbucks 9th Circuit Affirms Rejection of Data Breach Claims Against Gap — Ruiz v. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:33 pm
To support this position, Ryan cites an Eighth Circuit case, United States v Barrow, in which the court required a “deficiency in appointed counsel’s representation,” rather than simple “unwillingness … to communicate with counsel,” as well as the arguably similar cases of Stenson v Lambert and Hunter v Delo. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
To retroactivity and fair notice broadly, the brief argues, “no accused could have had notice that the laws of war applied in Yemen in 2000”—and in fact, “the President and Congress’s pronouncements that the United States was not at war in Yemen provided notice that the laws of w [read post]
