Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 201 - 220
of 68,664
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2009, 2:56 am
EN (Serbia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; KC (South Africa) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 630; [2009] WLR (D) 213 “The Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Specification of Particularly Serious Crimes) Order 2004, which was made under s 72(4)(a) of the 2002 Act and listed a [...] [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 2:46 am
BA (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PE (Cameroon) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2009] UKSC 7 ; [2009] WLR (D) 344 "A person who had made an asylum claim or a human rights claim within the meaning of s 113(1) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was [...] [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:27 am
R v A [2008] EWCA Crim 2908; [2008] WLR (D) 374 “The expression ‘new and compelling evidence … in relation to the qualifying offence’ in s 78(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 was not restricted to further evidence either from an individual who suggested that the defendant had admitted after the trial that he was [...] [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 11:37 am
I realized this morning I'd neglected to post that the CAC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 2:31 am
Regina v Varsani [2010] EWCA Crim 1938; [2010] WLR (D) 237 “Where an offender was convicted of being knowingly concerned in the fraudulent evasion of duty on counterfeit cigarettes, contrary to s 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979, the reference to the retail price of cigarettes ‘of that description’ in s 5(1) of the Tobacco Products Duty Act 1979, as amended, by which the value of the duty was to be calculated, was to the retail… [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 4:33 am
Regina v Barnett; [2011] EWCA Crim 2936; [2011] WLR (D) 385 “In relation to proceedings in which a defendant’s benefit from general criminal conduct was assessed the court was ‘entitled’ to make the assumptions provided for in section 10 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 even if the prosecution had not given the written preliminary notice provided for in section 71(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:07 am
Donald v Ntuli [2010] EWCA Civ 1276; [2010] WLR (D) 291 “Whether, in view of the principle of open justice, it was necessary for a court to restrain publication of the existence of proceedings and the anonymity of the parties, depended on the facts of the particular case. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 6:53 am
In Matter of Jessica D. v Michael E., the father of a child born in 2007 was in 2008 granted full legal and physical custody based largely on the fact that the mother was struggling with drug abuse. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
S. 767 (1882); Deakins v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:51 pm
Reflections by Ruth d/b/a Bytephoto.com, Chief Judge Jerome B. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:29 am
R (DB) v Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust [2008] EWCA Civ 1354; [2008] WLR (D) 375 “The effect of an order for the admission and detention of an offender in a hospital, within s 37 of the Mental Health Act 1983, was limited by s 40 to the period of 28 days from the date of the [...] [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:15 am
Her Majesty's Treasury v Information Commissioner [2009] EWHC 1811 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 251 “The convention that law officers' advice to ministerial departments should not be disclosed without their consent continued to operate after the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, but was subject to the principles of that Act. [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
S. ___, ___ (2015) (slip op., at 6) (quoting North Dakota v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 1:56 pm
Real property — Foreclosure — Post-sale exception In this appeal from a foreclosure action in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Terry D. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 7:17 am
In Rowe v Vargason, 2011 WL 4529341 (D. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:33 pm
In December 2009, Jeffrey D. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Ellen D. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
La Chambre rétorque que si un mandataire arrive à la conclusion que les Chambres ont pu avoir des exigences plus ou moins strictes, il devrait suivre la décision la plus sévère. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:05 pm
Citicorp, No. 12-0062 (D. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying… [read post]
