Search for: "S. v. D."
Results 201 - 220
of 62,633
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2013, 6:05 pm
Citicorp, No. 12-0062 (D. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 1:24 pm
S. 767 (1882); Deakins v. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:30 am
[S]ee Werner v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 2:11 pm
S. ___, ___ (2015) (slip op., at 6) (quoting North Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 2:15 am
Her Majesty's Treasury v Information Commissioner [2009] EWHC 1811 (Admin); [2009] WLR (D) 251 “The convention that law officers' advice to ministerial departments should not be disclosed without their consent continued to operate after the enactment of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, but was subject to the principles of that Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 2:59 am
Ellen D. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 7:44 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 11:15 pm
La Chambre rétorque que si un mandataire arrive à la conclusion que les Chambres ont pu avoir des exigences plus ou moins strictes, il devrait suivre la décision la plus sévère. [read post]
11 Nov 2017, 11:00 am
Supp. 3d 665, 704–705 (D. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:42 am
Lis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:27 am
Regina v C [2010] EWCA Crim 2971; [2011] WLR (D) 347 “Where a defendant wished to challenge evidence of earlier convictions which the Crown sought to deploy as relevant to the question of whether the defendant was responsible for the commission of the offences for which he was on trial, the defendant’s bare assertion that he did not commit those earlier offences was inadequate; it was essential that the defendant provide a detailed defence statement identifying… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:25 am
Regina v Lee [2010] EWCA Crim 1404; [2010] WLR (D) 160 “The offence under s 85(5)(b) of the Medicines Act 1968 of selling or supplying a medicinal product which was misleadingly labelled or marked in respect of the nature or quality of the product, where such sale or supply was done by a person ‘in the course of a business carried on by him’, could not be committed by a person who was merely employed or engaged by the business which carried out the sale… [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:24 pm
This case involves a dispute regarding a 2001 option to purchase 60.419 acres of farmland. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 2:08 pm
[France][Petition granted][ Mother’s motion for reconsideration denied] Peyre v McGarey, 2023 WL 4351544 (D. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:50 pm
In Edwin Cheek v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
He later decides that for convenience, he’d like […] The post Authorized User v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
Failure to Satisfy the APA’s Arbitrary and Capricious Standard Next, the court addressed whether the department's decision to remove 3-D gun blueprints from the USML was “arbitrary and capricious. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 2:17 pm
Securities Experts Roundtable The Expert’s Examiner Stifel, Nicolaus & Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:10 am
British Airways plc v Unite the Union [2010] WLR (D) 131 “When, following a ballot the result of which supported strike action, one was asking whether a union and its members were protected from a claim in tort under certain provisions within Part V of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, the conditions contained in s 231 of the Act as to the provision by the union of information to its members concerning the results of the ballot… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
S. 48, 49, 57 (1964) (corporate tax records); McPhaul v. [read post]
