Search for: "SHERMAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 201 - 220
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2011, 7:21 am
Yesterday, in Golan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:02 pm
When this case was in the Second Circuit, the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division — asked for its views — said that such large payments were presumed to be invalid under the Sherman Act. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm
The term of the consent decree is seven years.The case is U.S. and State of Texas v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 10:42 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:31 pm
While the expert utilized the 1997 version of the Department of Justice/FTC Merger Guidelines to formulate the market, the guidelines were applied in an overly mechanical fashion, in the court’s view. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 12:11 pm
Recently, the DOJ filed a federal antitrust action ( U.S. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:02 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:55 pm
The proposed consent decree in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:05 am
The Justice Department asked for the stay Wednesday in the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm
The SG has carved out an enclave where territorially circumscribed non-Article III courts have the final word on everything from the Sherman Act to the U.S. [read post]
20 May 2010, 7:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s decision in Joblove v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Department of Justice attorney Warren E. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 5:52 pm
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm
It is not hyperbole to recall the trenchant words of Chief Justice John Marshall: “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm
See Starr v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 8:43 am
”He referred to NCAA v. [read post]
