Search for: "STANLEY V JUSTICE" Results 201 - 220 of 557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The OCC’s submission was that the duty to trace “is still a component of the search for a durable solution, that is, one which will last beyond their 18th birthday” [67] (v). [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 8:17 am by Scott Michelman
And at the Supreme Court, it’s the rationale for a steady string of summary reversals, including yesterday’s decision in Taylor v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:54 am by Schachtman
Dean, Thomas Craig Earnest, and Stanley L. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Reed stated on behalf of all the justices that the starting point for the contractual interpretation is the words the parties used in condition 11.9(a). [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:27 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Bourgass & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 16-17 February 2015. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Morgan Stanley & Co International Plc v Tael One Partners Ltd, heard 17 November 2014. [read post]