Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF D B" Results 201 - 220 of 10,340
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2012, 7:45 am by lawmrh
" Conversely, merit selection/judicial retention Arizona received a "B-" for the same category, which partly explains its overall gentleman's "D+" versus Nevada's "D-. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:57 pm
Nonetheless, these materials may still be responsive to Items 4(c) or (d) and, if privileged, as with other privileged 4(c) or 4(d) materials, should still be listed in the privilege log. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 11:53 am by Mary Anne Peck
Spilka (D) said there’s a dire need for more workers in all sectors, particularly healthcare, and building out the state’s workforce would be a key focus for her in 2023. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:45 am by Arina Shulga
 Rule 506(b) or (c) offerings are exempt from regulation on the state level. [read post]
14 Aug 2024, 9:42 am by Alyzza Austriaco
” But he added: “the thing that I think is so interesting is that legislators are communicating across state lines and across party lines about this. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 6:06 pm
The New York State Insurance Department has just released its proposed regulatory agenda for the second half of 2009. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 2:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 5:31 pm by Kevin LaCroix
I welcome guest post submissions from responsible authors on topics of interest to this site’s readers. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 8:50 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
TAYLOR, 353 U.S. 569 (1957), WHICH STATED “NO [SUCH] AUTHORITY” EXISTS; (B) THE PLAIN LANGUAGE OF THE STATUTE INCLUDING THE CONJUNCTIVE “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE” IN ARTICLE 66(d) IN CONTRAST TO AUTHORITY GRANTED THE JUDGE ADVOCATES GENERAL IN ARTICLE 69(a) TO ACT WITH RESPECT TO “FINDINGS AND SENTENCE OR BOTH” AND THE CONVENING AUTHORITY IN ARTICLE 60(f)(3) TO ORDER SENTENCE REHEARINGS; AND (C) JUDICIAL ECONOMY. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
The court held that the district court had the power to award restitution pursuant to Section 13(b) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. 53(b). [read post]
6 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 4(2) specifies eight categories of offenses that shall not be considered to be political offenses: (a) a murder or other willful crime against the person of a Head of State or Head of Government of one of the Contracting States, or of a member of the Head of State’s family; (b) aircraft hijacking offenses; (c) acts of aviation sabotage; (d) crimes against internationally protected persons, including diplomats; (e) hostage taking; (f)… [read post]
7 May 2007, 10:59 am
Reference: ERISA § § 206(d)(3)(B)(ii), 514(a), 514(b)(7); IRC § 414(p)(1)(B) Must a Domestic Relations Order be issued by a state court? [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 11:18 am by Jessica Mendelson
Mark Bartelstein & Associates d/b/a Priority Sports & Entertainment, recently filed in the Central District of California, provides an interesting look at both non-compete and trade secret law, as seen through the world of a sports agent. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Subsection (b) therefore does not override express restrictions on disclaimers contained in the instrument creating the fiduciary relationship or in other statutes of the state. [read post]
13 May 2010, 7:53 am by Brian E. Barreira
  After all, Section 1022(d)(1)(B)(iii) specifically states:  “The decedent shall not be treated as owning any property by reason of holding a power of appointment with respect to such property. [read post]
1 May 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Aside from the interest and other penalties imposed under state law, the delinquent payor of alimony faces yet another level of adverse consequences for the delay in payment. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 4:45 am by Eric B. Meyer
But, if she does, will it be because (a) the plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail on the merits, (b) the plaintiffs cannot establish irreparable harm, (c) the balance of equities disfavors an injunction, (d) public interest favors implementation of the rule, or some combination of (a), (b), (c), and (d)? [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:45 am by Ken Lammers
Commonwealth, MAR11, VaSC No. 092395 (deciding that Commonwealth Attorneys can prosecute civil cases of refusing to submit to breath or blood tests) - I tripped over a footnote in which Justice Lemons was kind enough to list civil things that the General Assembly has entrusted to local Commonwealth Attorneys:2.2-3126(B) - conflict of interest opinions3.2-3947(B) - enjoining pesticide violations3.2-4505(2) - apple injunctions3.2-4749 - farm produce… [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 2, 2011 Danos v. [read post]