Search for: "Said v. Clinton"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2020, 2:42 pm
It's often said that when one files a defamation suit, one is only asking for more attention, and given her low standing in the polls, perhaps that is precisely what Gabbard has in mind. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 6:53 am
(There is one citation to Clinton v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Humphrey … with intent to subvert the authority of the Government of the United States, to hinder and delay the due execution of the laws of the United States, and to oppress and injure citizens of the United States, did unlawfully act as judge of an illegally constituted tribunal within said State, called the district court of the Confederate States of America, and as judge of said tribunal … then and there assumed and exercised powers unlawful and unjust, to wit, in… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:00 am
” The House’s actions, said the majority leader, would ensure that impeachment became routine, a “constant part…of the political background noise” and of the “arms race of polarization. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 8:18 am
That said, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the Republicans can maintain complete control over every aspect of the upcoming proceeding so long as they maintain a solid block of 51 votes. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 12:29 am
Andrew Johnson's historical reputation has suffered much more than Bill Clinton's. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 10:28 am
Twenty-six words in the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
He said I was “an embarrassment to the federal courts. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
In 1976 in Elrod v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am
” In fact, Clinton’s defense lawyers never raised the clear statement rule argument. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 7:41 am
As Scalia noted in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am
[Walter Nixon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
His trial offers the possibility of fresh insights into the strange quest by some in Trump’s orbit for a kind of political kryptonite to use against Hillary Clinton – secret emails that would, they hoped, destroy her candidacy. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 10:40 am
" Ray v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
What is “executive privilege”? [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:33 am
Clinton D. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
We also looked at Office of Legal Counsel memoranda dealing with various narrow impeachment-related questions from the Clinton administration. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:52 am
As the Supreme Court made clear in Nixon v. [read post]
