Search for: "Samples v. Samples" Results 201 - 220 of 5,723
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by CAFE
In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet and Joyce discuss the Supreme Court order rejecting a request to block Texas’s new restrictive abortion law from going into effect. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by CAFE
In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet and Joyce discuss the Supreme Court order rejecting a request to block Texas’s new restrictive abortion law from going into effect. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 4:32 pm by CAFE
In this sample from the CAFE Insider podcast, Preet and Joyce discuss the Supreme Court order rejecting a request to block Texas’s new restrictive abortion law from going into effect. [read post]
21 May 2011, 6:05 am
No case like this holds that forced catheterization for a urine sample is unreasonable or reasonable. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:34 am by sally
MAK and RK v United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights “The taking of blood samples and of intimate photographs of a girl aged nine, without her parents’ consent, violated article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to respect for private and family life. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 2:30 am
Yearworth and others v North Bristol NHS Trust [2009] EWCA Civ 37; [2009] WLR (D) 34 “The sperm sample of a person undergoing chemotherapy treatment, stored by a hospital for his benefit for future use in case the treatment made him infertile, was property owned by him whose loss or damage entitled him to bring an [...] [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:12 am
Yearworth and Others v North Bristol NHS Trust Court of Appeal “A sample of sperm from a person undergoing chemotherapy, which a hospital stored in case he became infertile after the treatment, was that person's property and its loss or damage was capable of establishing a claim in negligence. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 1:32 am by tortsprof
" Here's a sample: If Albert Snyder is going to win on appeal, he will have to convince the Supreme Court that Phelps' speech is somehow different... [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:02 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Specifically, admission of the urine test report violates Defendant’s constitutional rights to Confrontation, pursuant to Crawford v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 2:41 pm by CAFE
Texas, Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, order, 10/8/21United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm by CAFE
District Court Southern District of Georgia, indictment, 4/28/21Georgia v. [read post]