Search for: "Schroeder v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2022, 8:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Schroeder v Escalera Ranch Owners’ Association, Inc., 646 S.W. 3d 329 (TX 2022) [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” However, employees of a political subdivision of the State are not within the ambit of §80-a of the Civil Service Law which applies only to the suspension or demotion of employees of the State as the employer upon the abolition or reduction of  State positions in the non-competitive class. [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm by Steve Kalar
  Nothing more patriotic for the Fourth of July than a case upholding core constitutional rights (and a remarkable article advocating for greater justice in our system of criminal law and procedure).United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:36 am by Aaron
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/823979.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 3:06 am by Sean Harrington
Schroeder, Professor Patty Ferguson-Bohnee, Justice Ruth V. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 11:00 pm by Hayleigh Bosher
The first two authorities, Nichols v Amalgamated Press (1908) Macg Cop Cas (1905-10) 2 166 and Schroeder Music Publishing v Macaulay [1974] 1 WLR 1308 (HL), involved music publishing contracts where the copyright assigned was in a musical composition, depriving the creator of the ability to benefit economically from their creation for the term of the copyright. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Schroeder For the Symposium on Administrative Reform of Immigration LawUnder our constitutional system of separation of powers, does the President have the authority to defer the deportation of the undocumented parents of children who are lawfully present in the United States, to permit these persons to apply for work authorization and also to expand the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals first announced in 2012? [read post]
The
20 Aug 2012, 11:24 am by Jon Sands
The dissenters wring their hands, shrug their shoulders, and say that under AEDPA the state court's ruling was not unreasonable (really).US v. [read post]