Search for: "Smith v. Smith State Prison" Results 201 - 220 of 1,093
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
Residents may return, although they are discouraged from leaving, and must self-isolate in one of only four places Yellowknife, Inuvik, Hay River or Fort Smith, regardless of where they actually live. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am by INFORRM
Wilson v Williams No. 20-3447- the Sixth Circuit declined to overturn a district courts preliminary injunction which ordered federal officers to remove certain at-risk inmates from a coronavirus ridden prison in Ohio. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am by Dan Maurer
The main thrust of the provision asked whether senior commanders (the commanders of organizations like combat divisions and corps, combatant commands, fleets, special operations forces, and entire installations) should be able to decide, like a district attorney, whether alleged violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that constitute “felonies” (those offenses carrying maximum punishment of greater than a year in prison) shall be “referred” to… [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am by Emily Coward
Smith, The Historical and Constitutional Contexts of Jury Reform, 25 Hofstra L. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Ohio even though her trial (obviously) occurred before the Supreme Court ruling in her case; other prisoners whose trials occurred before Mapp v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 6:50 am by Andrew Hamm
Smith 19-1106Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 6:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 19-5652,Smith v. [read post]
28 Feb 2020, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Top of the Ninth, Merle Kahn breaks down Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
Adam Liptak reports for The New York Times that during yesterday’s argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]