Search for: "Smith v. United States" Results 201 - 220 of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Oct 2011, 3:04 pm by Bridget Crawford
Reuters reports on the United States Supreme Court’s denial of cert today in Oren Adar v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 10:31 am by Dennis Crouch
The basic framework is that the Constitution requires all “Officers of the United States” to be nominated by the President with “Consent of the Senate. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:49 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog recently featured a post on the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:21 am by Debra A. McCurdy
Reed Smith's Global Regulatory Enforcement Law Blog recently featured a post on the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am by Alex Phipps
Georgia from the Supreme Court of the United States, decided on February 21, 2024. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 3:04 pm by Steve Sady
” The major new case was the ground-breaking decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 8:51 pm by Jane Chong
Ct. 2473 (2014) changes the precedential effect of Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 7:05 am by IPWatchdog
United States Postal Service, a case that asks the nation’s highest court to determine whether the federal government constitutes a “person” for the purposes of instituting review proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA). [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 2:37 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The court explained that these judges are principal officers under the constitution and thus, must be appointed by the President of the United States rather than merely the Head of Department. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 8:54 am by WIMS
Nick Smith challenges the United States Department of Agriculture's determination that Smith had converted 2.24 acres of wetland on his property and that he is, consequently, totally ineligible for program benefits. [read post]