Search for: "State Public Defender v. Iowa District Court" Results 201 - 220 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-16 in the District of New Mexico, Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. [read post]
17 May 2024, 1:07 pm by John Ross
District court: Permitless carry is legal in Iowa so those circumstances didn't provide reasonable suspicion for the stop and search; gun suppressed. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm by Wolfgang Demino
§ 1334(a) and (b) and the Standing Order of Reference entered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Mary Ziegler
Ohio, Alabama, Iowa, and Oklahoma announced similar bans.The impact of these bans is self-evident. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am by Kelly
(Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Intent to deceive element of false marking claim cannot be inferred from length of time since patent expired: United States of America, et. al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:06 am by Eric
Sept. 9, 2011), the court denied a fee shift to the defendant. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 2:28 pm
Lebowitz The author is a Queens County Supreme Court justice. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OCA Not Proper Party In Judges' Pay Suit September 14, 2007 To the Editor, In the Law Journal on Sept. 11, page 2 (see below), the attorney for the judges who are petitioners in Maron v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
Thus, the court cannot determine from defendant's papers whether the defendant asserted a failure of the plaintiff to state a cause of action or cited the Graves Amendment as a defense in its pleading. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Montgomery Ward & Co (Patently-O) (Patently-O) (GRAY On Claims) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) District Court S D Iowa: Intent to deceive inferred when plaintiff adds element to patent claims to overcome rejection but fails to disclose prior art containing that element: Sabasta et al v Buckaroos, Inc (Docket Report) District Court E D New York: Failure to disclose specific combination of prior art precludes invalidity argument based on such… [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Supreme Court Stops Lower Court Order Requiring Alabama to Draw a New District Voting Map Favorable to Black Residents MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 2/7/2022 The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 12:12 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
Iowa and Alaska are but two examples of such other states that have commissioned multiple-year programs to study the effects of cameras in the courtroom. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” For CNN, Clare Foran reports that over “the past year, state legislatures in Iowa, Louisiana and Mississippi have advanced stri [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]