Search for: "State of Maine v. Cross"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
MakinThe State of Maine has a problem. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
First, neither of the main arguments of the plurality appear to have much traction. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Raich, which held that Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce was so broad that it allowed it to ban the possession of medical marijuana that had never crossed state lines or been sold in any market, even within a state. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 5:46 am
” But it was unclear how the petitioners would have benefited from cross-examination. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:49 pm
Eugene Volokh links to United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
See Nigra v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:08 am
Torts -- Automobile accident -- Damages -- New trial is required where plaintiff's counsel made an improper appeal to passion and sympathy of jury in opening statement, improperly convinced trial judge to limit defense counsel's cross-examination of plaintiff's expert, improperly attacked character of main defense expert during cross-examination, and made improper and prejudicial closing argument DANIEL GILBERT ANDREW CHIN, Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm
With Karen Halverson Cross, he filed an amicus brief in support of the respondents in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm
During cross-examination it became clear that Mr Weayou was changing and embellishing his evidence to suit his own purposes. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
In Rubin, whether enforcement may be effected through the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
(United States v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:40 pm
The effects of recent changes on two of the main building blocks of constitutionalism - statehood and democracy - are examined in Parts I and II. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 8:17 am
Fidel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 5:57 am
Although Supreme Court cases like United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:14 pm
Yesterday, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
See Nigra v. [read post]
