Search for: "State of Oregon v. Smith" Results 201 - 220 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 12:14 pm by Roy Ginsburg
In adopting the ministerial exception, the Court distinguished its prior holding in Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
A court in Illinois has ruled that the US-based technology blog, TechnoBuffalo, does not qualifiy for state shield law and must disclose its source’s identity. “The decision against the consumer electronics blog TechnoBuffalo comes just one month after a federal district court in Oregon made a similar ruling regarding a Montana blogger, finding that she did not qualify as a journalist under Oregon’s reporter’s shield law” reports RCFP. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:59 am by JB
Smith, which held that there is no free exercise violation when states apply a rule of general applicability to religiously motivated conduct. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 6:11 am
 In  Smith, two members of the Native American Church were denied state unemployment benefits after it was determined that they had been fired from their jobs for ingesting peyote, a crime under Oregon law. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:05 pm
 In  Smith, two members of the Native American Church were denied state unemployment benefits after it was determined that they had been fired from their jobs for ingesting peyote, a crime under Oregon law. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Among the privacy cases of early 2011 was MNB v News Group Newspapers ([2011] EWHC 528 (QB)). [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Michael Smith and I have just filed an amicus brief that I drafted for Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment (AWARE) in the Michigan Second Amendment stun gun case, People v. [read post]