Search for: "State v Mark Brown" Results 201 - 220 of 1,341
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2013, 1:01 pm by Mali Friedman
Additionally, as a practical matter, some service providers already require a search warrant before disclosing stored content to law enforcement based on the Sixth Circuit’s 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
Mark Walsh covered the Court’s denial of certiorari in a special-education “stay put” case, Ridley School District v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 3:36 pm by Nikki Siesel
Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc., 203 USPQ 305, 316 (TTAB 1979); GAF Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:00 pm by Doug Cornelius
United States Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.), and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, along with Representatives Mark Pocan (D-Wisc.), and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) unveiled the Stop Wall Street Looting Act last week. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 2:41 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Dixon, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2163 (05 October 2012) Ferriter, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2211 (03 October 2012) Matthews, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2154 (27 September 2012) Williamson, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 2114 (02 August 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Whiston, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 1374 (25 October 2012) Davies & Ors v Secretary of… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm by WIMS
Attorney General Coakley, who recently lost her run for Ted Kennedy's Senate seat to [See WIMS 1/20/10] Republican Scott Brown said, “The Endangerment Finding marked the end of an era in which the federal government refused to acknowledge that anything could or should be done about global climate change. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:41 am by SHG
With respect to due process, “[a] non-domiciliary tortfeasor has minimum contacts with the forum State . . . if it purposefully avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State” (LaMarca, 95 NY2d at 216 [internal quotations marks and citations omitted]),“thus invoking the benefits and protections of [the forum state’s] laws” (Hanson v Denckla, 357 US 235, 253 [1958]). [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 3:07 am by Ellena Erskine
Supreme Court Declines Bid to Rename ‘Brown v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:31 am
Supreme Court's recent prison overcrowding case of Brown v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Stawski claimed rights to his marks in nine states, as an exception to John Gregory Lawson's registration for the mark PROSPER for wines, but Stawski failed to show prior, lawful use of his marks (and he also failed to prove that confusion is not likely). [read post]