Search for: "State v. Barry"
Results 201 - 220
of 1,406
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Freundel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:15 am
Co-authored by Barry Miller and Jeremy W. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm
See also Transcript of Testimony of Barry Castleman at 377, in Benton v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Barry Barnett Our feed smokes, but not in that way. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 2:26 pm
State Bar of California, Rust v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 11:34 pm
Barry S. due to my hiatus. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case of Virginia v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Barry Cushman has posted The Hughes-Roberts Visit, which is forthcoming in the Green Bag 15 (2012). [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
The case of Coburn v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Windsor and Burwell v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
Barry Black, the first black chaplain of the United States Senate; Rep. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:26 am
Barry Black, the first black chaplain of the United States Senate; Rep. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 8:50 am
Yesterday, Whistleblowers in United States ex. rel.Fowler v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Pullman, and United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 7:58 am
Best Van Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:05 pm
Shroyer v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 11:29 am
Fowler v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:30 pm
"Contrary to the [Respondents'] contention, the proceeding was not rendered academic by its post-commencement disclosure of records in response to some of the [Plaintiff] requests, since an actual controversy between the parties still exists concerning whether the [Plaintiff's] remaining requests are exempt from disclosure (see Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505; cf. [read post]
